Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Legislative Rules topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
House adopts HR3 to require additional standing-committee review of bills after debate over timing and exceptions
Summary
Lawmakers passed House Resolution 3 to require standing committee review of bills before floor consideration, prompting debate about schedule impacts and exceptions for interim committee work; HR3 passed 64–3 on the floor.
Representative Melvin R. Brown sponsored House Resolution 3, which directs that certain bills be reviewed by a House standing committee before they may be brought to the House floor. Brown and backers framed the measure as a procedural reform to increase public input and ensure legislators have adequate information before voting.
Opponents and questioners said the rule could create scheduling challenges during a compressed session, particularly for committees already handling large workloads and for bills that had advanced through interim committees. Representatives sought assurances about suspending the rule for urgent matters; Brown and others clarified the rule may be suspended by a vote.
Supporters described the proposal as a step to slow down ‘‘slip-through’’ legislation and increase public participation in the committee process. Representative Olson and other backers said the change would improve oversight and legislative deliberation.
The House adopted HR3 by a recorded vote: 64 yes, 3 no. The resolution was read by title, signed by the Speaker, entered in the Journal and the Rules Committee was excused for a related meeting.
What happens next: The new House rule was entered in the Journal and will guide the House’s committee and floor scheduling until changed or suspended by the chamber.
