Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Local Finance topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
After reconsideration, House approves channeling local sales-tax diversion to Bridgeland Ice Arena
Summary
Following an initial close defeat and floor reconsideration, the House voted to let participating municipalities redirect a local sales-tax share to the Bridgeland Ice Arena project; supporters described local resolutions and bond counsel guidance.
Senate Bill 34, which allows participating municipalities to channel a local share of sales-and-use tax receipts toward construction of the Bridgeland Ice Arena, was the subject of extended debate and a floor reconsideration before it passed the House.
Representative Butters outlined the bill—s purpose: to enable Tax Commission collection and redirection of a small fraction of sales-tax receipts that previously financed the Olympic fund, now redirected back to communities, to instead be channeled to the ice-arena project where municipalities have requested such treatment. He noted prior local commitments, a $250,000 initial legislative appropriation for the arena, a $500,000 foundation commitment and restaurant-tax revenue pledged by the county.
The bill initially failed on a close vote (33 yes, 34 no). Representative Johnson moved to reconsider; members agreed and reopened the measure for debate. Supporters said the change simply enacted local decisions and was structured to enable bonding by creating a predictable revenue stream; opponents had earlier questioned whether the state should collect then redirect the funds rather than letting cities handle them.
After additional floor discussion and several representatives describing local support for the project, the House passed SB34 on reconsideration, 64 yes and 3 no. Sponsors said the channeling is purely optional and applies only where local governments have passed resolutions requesting the diversion.
