Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Disability Services topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

House approves $360,000 appropriation for intervener services for deaf-blind residents after debate

Utah House of Representatives · January 20, 2000
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Lawmakers approved HB205, a fiscal-note measure to fund intervener services for Utah residents who are both deaf and blind; supporters described a small population with specialized communication needs while some lawmakers requested more fiscal detail.

The Utah House on Jan. 20 approved HB205, an appropriation intended to fund ‘‘intervener’’ services for residents who are both deaf and blind. Representative Jerry A. Adair, sponsor, said committee testimony identified about 21 people in the state who need one-on-one intervention to communicate and function in daily life. The bill carries a fiscal note of roughly $360,000 to provide about 40 hours a month per person at pay rates discussed on the floor ($11–$14 per hour).

Floor debate focused on program overlap and fiscal clarity. Several members asked whether current programs already cover these services and requested budget figures and the rationale for presenting the measure on the floor instead of through the appropriations process. Representative Adair said testimony in committee indicated these people lacked funding and that the appropriation represented new money; proponents argued the modest amount would save much larger care costs if individuals required institutional care in the future. Opponents urged circling the bill to compile detailed fiscal data; the motion to circle failed and the House proceeded to a vote. HB205 passed 65–8 and was referred to the Senate for further action.

The sponsor identified the Division of Services for the Visually Blind and Impaired in the State Office of Rehabilitation as the intended recipient for implementation; floor debate requested departmental figures and comparisons to existing interpreter and support programs.