Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Labor Wages topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
House rejects payment-of-wages amendments after extended debate; vote 33–37
Summary
Second substitute Senate Bill 186, which would strengthen wage-notification rules and increase penalties for unpaid wage awards, was circled, debated at length and ultimately failed in the House by a 33–37 vote after a call of the House.
A proposed change to Utah’s wage-collection enforcement regime failed in the House on Feb. 28 after prolonged floor debate and a call of the chamber.
Second substitute Senate Bill 186, described by sponsors as amendments to payment-of-wages provisions, was circled for consideration and discussed at length. Supporters said the measure updates posting and employee-notification requirements, authorizes the Labor Commission to publish a model notice, and creates stiffer penalties for employers who do not pay adjudicated wage awards. One provision would impose a triple-damages penalty on employers who fail to pay a final award within 30 days.
Members pressed sponsors on the policy rationale for increasing penalties and on whether the new posting and electronic-notification options would unduly burden employers. Some lawmakers said the Labor Commission already provides many of the notices and questioned why new statutory language was necessary. Sponsors responded that the changes responded to recurring nonpayment and delay in adjudicated claims and were approved by the Labor Commission.
After debate and a procedural call of the House during final roll call, the speaker announced the second substitute SB 186 failed in the House by a recorded vote of 33 yes and 37 no. The bill will return to the Senate.
