Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Local Tax Policy topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
House approves 'zap tax' changes to sales/use distribution for cultural and recreational organizations
Summary
The House passed first substitute Senate Bill 234 (the so-called "zap tax"), which adjusts sales and use tax distribution and local petition processes for botanical, cultural, recreational and zoological facilities; supporters and members debated county/city classification and petition timing before a 63-5 passage.
The Utah House on Feb. 28 approved first substitute Senate Bill 234, legislation amending sales-and-use tax distribution rules for botanical, cultural, recreational and zoological organizations and facilities — commonly referred to during debate as the "zap tax."
The sponsor described the measure as adjusting how sales tax revenues are distributed—particularly among second- through sixth-class counties—and enabling local agreements between counties and cities to preserve county revenue shares while permitting cities to seek their own ballot measures. "Beginning in 02/2003, if a county chooses not to use it... a city can hold the solicitation for the city themselves," the sponsor said when explaining the petition and timing process.
House members sought clarifications about which classes of counties and municipalities the change would apply to and whether cities in second-class counties would be able to act; the sponsor explained a technical distinction: second-class counties themselves may act but cities within second-class counties were not covered by that provision as drafted. Members discussed options including truth-in-taxation processes and potential local tax-raising alternatives.
After extended questions and explanation on the procedural mechanics and timing, the House passed first substitute SB234 on a recorded vote of 63 yes and 5 no; the bill will be returned to the Senate for signature and enrollment.
