Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the State Tax Policy topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
House approves tax cuts for low‑income filers, rejects immediate indexing that would raise long‑term cost
Summary
The Utah House advanced measures aimed at cutting income‑tax burdens for very low‑income residents and approved one‑time bracket adjustments that expand tax relief; lawmakers debated but rejected a motion to restore automatic indexing, citing fiscal concerns. (Votes and amendment activity recorded.)
The Utah House on Feb. 23 approved measures designed to reduce income‑tax obligations for low‑income filers and adopted one‑time bracket adjustments while declining to restore automatic indexing for tax brackets.
Representative Curtis introduced Senate Bill 34 as part of a tax reduction package, saying the bill "says if you don't have any federal income tax due, you don't have to file a state income tax." He described the measure as targeted relief "for those lowest low income people." Representative Saunders and other supporters urged the House to approve the measure on fairness grounds.
On a related measure, leaders debated a substitute for Senate Bill 36 that broadened tax brackets and increased the short‑term fiscal impact. Representative King warned the substitute "changes the amount of money from about $4,000,000 to about $18,000,000" and said the difference would come from the Uniform School Fund, framing his opposition in budgetary terms. Supporters said the substitute produced a larger immediate tax cut the caucus had agreed upon; Representative Farren described it as the "least distasteful option" available to secure broader relief.
After the substitute was adopted on a 47–23 motion vote and later approved on third reading (reported 69–3), Representative Curtis moved to reconsider so the House could add an amendment to delay indexing until tax year 2004. Curtis said the proposed amendment would "start indexing" in 2004 so indexing would begin three years later, arguing it softened the fiscal hit while preserving the policy choice. Opponents pressed that restoring indexing would significantly increase long‑term fiscal exposure and recommended against reconsideration.
A call of the House was held during the debate; the motion to reconsider ultimately failed on a recorded vote (36 yes, 37 no). With reconsideration defeated, the House left the substitute in place and advanced the tax package items as adopted.
The House returned passed measures to the Senate for further consideration and signature, and the chamber continued to other bills on the calendar.
