Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Transportation topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
House approves allowing certified clean‑fuel vehicles into HOV lanes, sponsor says it will cut pollution
Summary
The House passed first-substitute HB 289 to allow certified clean‑fuel vehicles to use HOV lanes; backers said it encourages fleet conversion and reduces emissions, while some members warned about incentivizing fossil fuels and practical enforcement challenges. The measure passed 50–16 and will be sent to the Senate.
The Utah House voted to pass first‑substitute House Bill 289 on Feb. 16, 2001, a measure that would permit vehicles certified as clean‑fuel to use high‑occupancy vehicle (HOV) lanes even with fewer than the usual number of occupants. Representative Don Bush, the sponsor, said the goal is to encourage cleaner vehicles and reduce pollution along the Wasatch Front while easing congestion for many fleet vehicles that run on alternative fuels.
Bush summarized that there are roughly 4,500 alternate‑fuel vehicles in Utah — about 2,400 natural‑gas, 1,500 propane and 600 ethanol vehicles — and he estimated roughly 400 might use HOV lanes in Salt Lake County. He said the decal and certificate program to identify qualifying vehicles has been coordinated with the Tax Commission, Utah Department of Motor Vehicles and the Utah Highway Patrol, and that enforcement would rely on a decal on the license plate, similar to other special plates or decals.
Questioners raised operational and equity concerns. Representative Allen asked how officials would validate that a vehicle was actually using the alternative fuel rather than switching fuels; Bush replied enforcement would rely on certification and decals and that many new vehicles are designed to run on alternate fuel as a primary source. Representative Clark said she worried the measure might inadvertently incentivize additional fossil‑fuel use (natural gas) and urged consideration of battery or renewable fuel technologies instead.
Supporters stressed environmental and congestion benefits. Representative Barris, who identified a personal conflict (drives an alternate‑fuel vehicle), said the bill advances the original purpose of HOV lanes to reduce emissions and congestion and that many qualifying vehicles are fleet vehicles already in use. Representative Jones and Representative King also spoke in favor, describing it as a timely incentive to increase adoption of cleaner fuels.
Representative Bush noted the bill includes a sunset and that California experience suggests HOV lanes would not be overcrowded by such an allowance. After debate and a motion to cut off further discussion, the House approved the bill 50–16 and sent it to the Senate for further consideration.
