Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Public Health Tobacco Prevention topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
House narrows and approves plan to direct interest from tobacco‑settlement trust to prevention programs
Summary
Lawmakers amended H.B. 290 to delete a statutory earmark and then passed the bill 69-0; the measure aligns statute with the voter‑approved trust and directs a portion of interest to tobacco‑prevention activities after debate on program effectiveness and appropriations process.
Get email alerts on the Public Health Tobacco Prevention topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The Utah House on Feb. 16 voted unanimously to pass H.B. 290 as amended, a bill intended to align statute with the voter‑approved permanent trust created from the tobacco master settlement agreement and to allocate a portion of trust interest to tobacco‑prevention programs.
Representative Karen Morgan, the bill sponsor, said the measure corrects drafting problems from the prior session so the statute reflects the voters’ intent: half of the interest is returned to the trust principal while the other half goes to prevention efforts through the State Department of Health. Morgan said last year the legislature allocated $4 million to health‑department tobacco prevention and noted the Centers for Disease Control recommends substantially larger funding to be effective.
Opponents of the bill’s earmark language argued the House should preserve appropriation authority and decide allocations through the regular budget process. Representative Clark moved to delete lines 33–36 (the statutory earmark), arguing the appropriation process is the appropriate place for funding decisions; that motion was adopted after debate and division. Supporters of dedicated prevention funding said current spending falls short of CDC recommendations and emphasized the public‑health need.
After amendment, the House approved H.B. 290 as amended, 69-0, and the bill will be referred to the Senate.
What’s next: With the House adopting the amendment deleting the statutory earmark, funding decisions remain subject to the appropriations process even as the bill aligns statutory language with the trust created by voter approval.
