Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Education Funding topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

House passes HB 38 to increase state guarantee for school district voted and board leeway

Utah House of Representatives · January 29, 2001
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

House Bill 38 raises the state guarantee yield for school-district 'voted' and 'board leeway' property-tax levies over six years, projected to add about $76 million by year six; supporters said the change helps lower-valuation districts raise local revenue and moves toward equalization.

The Utah House approved House Bill 38 on a voice vote after floor presentation and limited discussion. Sponsor Representative Garn said HB 38 emerged from the long-term funding task force and would increase the state guarantee yield for voted and board leeway property-tax rates in annual steps over six years. Garn told colleagues the staged increases would put an additional $76,000,000 into the program by the end of year six and provide incentive for districts with low assessed valuation to impose local levies.

Garn framed the bill as part of a broader approach to public education funding, noting Utah’s high birthrate and rapid K–12 enrollment growth. He said the bill is not intended to force districts to levy taxes but to give them tools and closer steps toward equalization. Several members in the chamber identified themselves as educators or declared conflicts of interest before the vote; the clerk recorded numerous conflict-of-interest statements and 'so noted' entries.

After the sponsor’s presentation and brief floor exchange, the House closed voting on HB 38. The clerk reported the bill passed the House 68–0 and will be forwarded to the Senate for further action.

Supporters emphasized that the bill increases local flexibility without mandating new local levies and that the state guarantee would grow incrementally. No floor amendments were adopted in the recorded segment. The measure moves next to the Senate as part of the regular legislative process.