Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Criminal Code Assaults topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Utah House Rejects Proposal to Raise Assault Penalty for Sports Officials; Reconsideration Later Approved

Utah House of Representatives · February 2, 2001
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

After hours of debate about rising violence at youth and amateur sporting events, the House narrowly rejected a bill to make assaulting a sports official a class A misdemeanor (33–40); members later voted to reconsider and to 'circle' the bill for further work.

Representative David Hogue introduced House Bill 67 on the House floor, arguing that rising incidents of physical attacks on referees and umpires warrant stronger criminal penalties. "At the level we're seeing the violence and abuse of sports officials, I've got to tell you that it's getting to the serious stage," Hogue said, describing national incidents and urging lawmakers to "make a point" that officials deserve protection.

Opponents warned the proposal singled out a class of citizens and risked duplicating existing criminal statutes. "I see no difference between this piece of legislation and any of the other bills we've had considered ... when you're selecting a category, you're singling out a class," Representative (recorded as) Binion said during questioning. Representative Clark, who identified himself as an experienced official, argued that the criminal code already covers serious assaults and that prosecutors should enforce existing law.

Lawmakers who supported the bill stressed officials' vulnerability during games and said an enhanced penalty would prompt arrests and deter assaults. "By increasing the penalty ... I think would significantly decrease the assaults happening at these sports events," Representative McCartney said.

The House held its first final vote after debate: the reading clerk recorded 33 yes votes and 40 no votes, and HB 67 failed and was filed. Later in the day, a motion to reconsider that result passed (38 yes, 28 no) and the House moved to "circle" HB 67, reopening it for future action rather than leaving the initial defeat as final.

What happens next: circling a bill preserves an opportunity for amendment or further negotiation before another final vote. No amendment that would produce a changed final outcome was adopted on the floor during this session. The House did not enact HB 67 during the sitting; procedural votes mean the sponsor and opponents may continue negotiating next steps.