Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the HJR 16 Constitutional Notes topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
House rejects resolution to shift constitutional‑note responsibility from staff to legislators
Summary
First substitute HJR 16, which would have allowed legislators to prompt staff to prepare constitutional notes rather than relying on standing staff practice, failed on the floor (43 no, 29 yes) after prolonged debate on the proper balance between legislative responsibility and staff expertise.
Representative Yer introduced first substitute HJR 16, proposing changes to the Legislature's practice around constitutional notes so elected legislators — not staff — would more frequently assert constitutional concerns on bills.
Supporters said the change would return responsibility to elected lawmakers and reduce over‑reliance on staff. Opponents said staff and the general counsel provide impartial, technical expertise and that constitutional notes help the body understand fiscal and legal risks, not simply to kill bills. Several members noted empirical committee work showing bills with constitutional notes do not necessarily fail at higher rates.
After extended floor debate including practical questions about how the process would work, the House recorded the first substitute as failing with 29 yes and 43 no votes and filed the resolution.
Next steps: HJR 16 was filed after the failure; sponsors said they might continue to press for more legislative engagement on constitutional questions in future sessions.
