Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the HB 236 Indecent Display topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
House reopens indecent‑display statute to make it prosecutable, sponsor says
Summary
Representatives debated first substitute HB 236, amendments intended to narrow an outdated indecent‑display statute and define "serious value" for minors so prosecutors and courts can enforce the law; opponents warned the changes may remain vulnerable to constitutional challenge.
Representative Jenna Wallace, sponsor of first substitute House Bill 236, told the House the bill aims to "tighten, not lessen" Utah's indecent‑display laws and make them prosecutable by clarifying what material lacks "serious value" for minors.
Wallace said the Attorney General's Office asked the Legislature to sponsor revisions because the current language is too vague for courts to uphold and for prosecutors to win cases. The substitute inserts a definition of "serious value" — "having a serious literary, artistic, political, or scientific value for persons younger than 18 years of age" — and requires courts and prosecutors to consider the ages of minors who could be exposed to the material.
During questioning, Representative Ray asked who ultimately determines whether material has "serious value." Wallace responded that parents are the first line of decision making and that community standards and the legal process (including judges and juries) would play roles in adjudication. She said the amendment was drafted with input from the Attorney General's Office to improve constitutionality while preserving legitimate artistic and educational displays.
Representative Daniels, an adjunct constitutional‑law instructor, said the state's indecent‑display statutes had been "very clearly unconstitutional and can't be prosecuted" in their prior form and cautioned that while the substitute is "much closer" to constitutional standards, it could still be challenged in court. Other members echoed concerns that inserting age‑sensitivity and community‑standard language would still leave ultimate interpretation to judges and juries, raising questions about whether the bill meaningfully changes enforceability.
The sponsor said the goal is practical: give prosecutors a statute they can use and judges language they can apply so that explicit displays exposed to minors can be prosecuted when appropriate. The bill was uncircled and brought before the body for a vote; voting was opened on the floor after summation.
The House proceeded with further floor business before a final recorded outcome for HB 236 appears in the transcript.
Next steps: the bill was presented for floor voting after debate; the transcript does not include a final recorded tally for the first substitute in this excerpt.
