Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Lawmakers debate bill that would make plaintiffs liable for damages from losing lawsuits over permitted state projects

Utah House of Representatives · March 6, 2002
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

First Substitute Senate Bill 183, which would make parties who sue over state-permitted construction projects liable for delay damages if they lose, drew extended, heated debate over accountability, access to courts and whether the bill targets specific projects.

First Substitute Senate Bill 183 prompted prolonged debate on March 6, 2002, as members argued over whether a statute that would make plaintiffs liable for damages when they lose suits challenging permitted state construction projects is an appropriate check on litigation or an improper deterrent to lawful judicial review.

Sponsor Representative Garn described the bill as accountability for groups whose lawsuits delay permitted state projects and said delay costs for a high-profile project reached $2,000,000 per month. "When a group decided they didn't like the Legacy Highway ... the taxpayers of this state are spending $2,000,000 a month," the…

Already have an account? Log in

Subscribe to keep reading

Unlock the rest of this article — and every article on Citizen Portal.

  • Unlimited articles
  • AI-powered breakdowns of topics, speakers, decisions, and budgets
  • Instant alerts when your location has a new meeting
  • Follow topics and more locations
  • 1,000 AI Insights / month, plus AI Chat
30-day money-back on paid plans