Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Stormwater Infrastructure topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Commission approves Bridal Brook drainage project; engineer to submit revised restoration and monitoring plans

Inland Wetlands Commission · October 17, 2024
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The commission approved a two-phase Bridal Brook (Bruce Brook) drainage and stream-restoration project; the town-acquired phase will widen channels, create a low-flow meander, add riprap and a natural stream bottom in places, and require revised planting lists, access for maintenance and a multi-year monitoring plan tied to grant timelines.

The Inland Wetlands Commission approved a town-led drainage improvement and stream-restoration project on Bruce Brook (referred to in the record as Bridal Brook). The project, presented by Raju Wasamshedi of Western Sampson, is divided into two phases: phase 1 will open and widen a northern reach to detain flows longer and create a low-flow channel and restored wetland bench; phase 2 will widen downstream channel walls and may require additional right-of-way acquisitions.

Wasamshedi told commissioners the plan aims to replace channelized concrete-bottom sections with a more natural stream bottom where hydraulically appropriate, while using riprap in high-velocity areas. He said the plans have been sized with hydraulic modeling and noted that DEP and U.S. Army Corps permits will be required; portions of the project lie in Bridgeport and will require coordination with that city.

On restoration, Wasamshedi said the planting plan provided is a first cut and that he will supply species lists, quantities and anticipated sizes. He agreed to submit a revised restoration and monitoring plan reflecting commission markups and to propose a monitoring schedule; staff and a commissioner discussed 1–3 years of post-installation monitoring and the possibility of a maintenance bond aligned with grant timelines.

Commissioners asked about channel wall heights (approximately 5–7 feet), property acquisitions (the town has already acquired certain parcels and may need additional 10-foot permanent rights-of-way for phase 2), and removal of trees and stumps during excavation; the engineer said specific trees to be removed will be marked on the revised plans.

Speaker 6 moved to approve the project and Speaker 7 seconded; the commission voted in favor and asked staff to receive the revised plans and monitoring specifications prior to further administrative sign-off.