Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Judicial Conduct topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
House overrides governor’s veto on Judicial Conduct Commission changes
Summary
The Utah House voted 57–14 to override Governor Michael O. Leavitt’s veto of House Bill 136, a bill that would require fuller records from the Judicial Conduct Commission to be transmitted to the Utah Supreme Court. Supporters said the change improves accountability; opponents warned of encroaching on judicial independence.
The Utah House of Representatives voted 57–14 on April 24, 2002, to override Governor Michael O. Leavitt’s veto of House Bill 136, a measure that alters how the Judicial Conduct Commission documents and forwards complaints to the Utah Supreme Court.
Representative Bryson, the bill sponsor, told colleagues the measure is intended to ‘‘provide the Supreme Court with critical information so that it can review the Judicial Conduct Commission procedures both as to law and fact.’’ Bryson said the change would ensure ‘‘all of the information that they should have been receiving in the past’’ reaches the court and would improve accountability and the commission’s integrity.
Supporters described uneven practice in the transmission of records to the Supreme Court. Representative Yerra, who said he had served on the commission, cited data about complaints and public sanctions and argued the public deserves ‘‘accountability’’ and a reliable record for Supreme Court review. Proponents repeatedly pointed to past cases where stipulations and limited records hampered review and urged the House to act to standardize the record sent upward.
Opponents, including Representative Shurtleff and Representative Bradshaw, warned that the bill risks legislative overreach into judicial administration and that its work might be better completed in a regular session as part of more comprehensive reform. ‘‘I see no urgency that warrants a veto-override session,’’ Representative Bradshaw said, arguing the changes were ‘‘piecemeal’’ and should be considered with broader reforms.
The motion to consider the bill and proceed with an override was approved during the floor session; voting was opened on the override and the clerk announced the result as 57 yes, 14 no. The House thereby completed the formal override of the governor’s veto on HB136.
The vote concludes the House’s action on HB136 at the veto-override session. The transcript indicates the bill’s proponents framed the measure as a procedural fix to ensure the Utah Supreme Court receives a full record of Judicial Conduct Commission matters; opponents emphasized separation-of-powers concerns and urged a fuller review in a subsequent regular session.
