Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Statute Of Limitations topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
House advances substitute for HB39 to extend statute of limitations in child-abuse prosecutions
Summary
Lawmakers debated and adopted a first-substitute to House Bill 39 that changes time limitations for prosecuting certain offenses, focusing sponsor remarks on child-abuse cases while opponents warned about incremental criminalization and fiscal trade-offs. Outcome: substitute explained and left open for further action (procedural actions in session).
The Utah House considered a first-substitute for House Bill 39 on statute-of-limitations amendments, with sponsor Representative Bryson saying the change primarily affects child-abuse cases and would permit prosecutions back to a four-year window (not reaching decades into the past). Bryson argued the substitute limits retrospective reach to 1998 for child-abuse allegations and urged colleagues to support victims who come forward late.
Representative Daniels spoke against the measure, framing it within a broader critique of criminal-justice expansion. Daniels argued lawmakers routinely add crimes or extend penalties “one bill at a time,” cautioned about diminishing returns and enforcement costs, and cited a fiscal note of about $24,200, suggesting funds might be better spent on treatment or social programs. Daniels said he had voted against the bill previously and reiterated his opposition.
The floor discussion focused on legislative philosophy and on how far back prosecutors should be allowed to pursue cases; the sponsor emphasized the bill’s limited temporal reach for child-abuse offenses and distinguished capital felonies (which already have no limit). The House left discussion open to final calendaring and procedural placement consistent with the rules of the chamber.
