Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Medicaid Spend Down topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
House debate on HB037 focuses on easing Medicaid ‘spend down’ for aged, blind and disabled
Summary
Representative Rebecca Lockhart introduced First Substitute HB037 to restructure Medicaid spend‑down rules for the aged, blind and disabled, setting eligibility at 100% of the federal poverty level and reducing the amount beneficiaries must "spend down." Sponsors cited a 3:1 federal match and personal cases of hardship; the bill had unanimous committee support (8–0–2).
Representative Rebecca Lockhart outlined First Substitute House Bill 37 on the House floor, saying the measure would put into statute an eligibility level for the aged, blind and disabled at 100% of the federal poverty level and reform the Medicaid "spend down" calculation so affected individuals retain significantly more of their monthly income.
Lockhart described an illustrative case in which an individual receiving SSDI of $748 a month would under current rules be left with $398 after spending down; under the sponsor’s proposal that person would only have to spend down $10 and could keep $738 per month. "We aren't going to be forcing people into deeper poverty just so that they can receive some medications and some medical care," Lockhart said.
Members on the floor pressed the sponsor for clarifying details. A representative on the Appropriations Subcommittee described the fiscal note as "healthy" and advised the body that planning and budget recommendations include funding for the change. Lockhart summarized the fiscal impact on the floor as roughly $5,600,000 in state funds that would bring in about $14,000,000 in federal funds — a roughly 3‑to‑1 match — producing an estimated $20,000,000 in benefit.
Several speakers urged support on policy grounds and recounted constituent experiences. Lockhart read a case of a client at the Utah AIDS Foundation who, she said, divorced a 17‑year spouse because the couple’s combined income exceeded eligibility by $22 and otherwise would have had to spend down more than $600 — a change that, Lockhart said, would have left them homeless. "I had to help them file and receive their divorce ... so he could receive his medications and remain alive," Lockhart said.
The sponsor noted the bill was reported favorably out of the Health and Human Services Committee with a vote of 8 yes, 0 no, 2 absent. Floor debate focused on fiscal offsets and program scope; several members described the bill as a modest but necessary safety‑net reform for people who are working or trying to return to work. The transcript records presentation, committee recommendation and debate, but does not record a final House passage tally for HB037 in the available segment.
