Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Parking Fines topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
House debates substitute for Senate Bill 79 after dispute over proposed increases to disability-parking fines
Summary
Floor debate on Senate Bill 79 centered on changes to where funds are directed and a contentious proposal to increase fines for parking in disability or school-bus zones; sponsors and opponents disagreed over whether doubling fines is warranted and whether enforcement, not fee levels, is the core issue.
Representative Johnson moved to substitute the first substitute of Senate Bill 79 with a second substitute that restores fund allocation to the original recipient (local entities that administer the program) rather than targeting elderly and disabled recipients. Johnson said the earlier first substitute directing funds to elderly and disabled recipients proved unworkable.
The floor discussion turned to penalties for parking in disability zones and school-bus zones. Representative Harper said he would move an amendment to reduce a proposed doubling in fines to a 50% increase or a graduated 50–75% increase in certain cases, arguing that a 100% increase is unusually steep for state fines. "We're going through with the current draft of the bill, we are doubling the fee. It's a 100% increase," Harper said, and proposed reducing that in his amendment.
Other members disputed the need for a large fee increase and emphasized enforcement. Representative Snow argued the 50–100% increases were "way, way too much" and urged support for the substitute that mitigates the increase; another member said improved local enforcement would address the problem even with smaller fines. Representative 7 (a floor speaker in favor of the substitute) said enforcement is the real issue: "If we enforce it, even at a hundred dollars, it will solve the problem." Representative Johnson voiced support for the substitute.
The House adopted the motion to substitute and the bill was uncircled on the calendar for further floor action, with subsequent floor steps described in the record. The transcript shows multiple members expressing concern about the scale of fine increases and the need to align penalty levels with enforcement and local conditions.
