Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Legislative Appropriations Process topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
House debates overhaul of legislative appropriations process; members call for more study
Summary
Lawmakers debated HJR 18, a resolution by Rep. Wayne Harper to create a joint budget committee and change member selection; supporters said it would deepen legislative oversight of the budget while critics warned it would skew representation toward the majority and urged interim study.
A proposal to change how Utah’s Legislature prepares its budget drew extended floor debate Tuesday as Rep. Wayne Harper introduced a first substitute to HJR 18 that would create a joint budget committee and alter how members are chosen.
Harper, the bill sponsor, told colleagues the measure is the product of yearlong work to "change the legislative appropriation process" and to make the budget a year-long legislative responsibility. "We have selected from the members of our body a group that will be in charge of making sure the budgets are better," he said during floor remarks.
Supporters said a smaller, specialized committee would give legislators more continuity and technical familiarity with agency budgets. "One of the things I have noticed is there isn't really anyone that knows the budget from start to finish," Representative Yer said, arguing the change would let a handful of legislators track budget developments across sessions.
But opponents cautioned that the composition as written would shift advantage to the majority party. Representative Goodfellow questioned the numerical make-up of the committee and whether the minority would be fairly represented; Harper responded that the proposal sets 7 majority and 2 minority members for most of the year, expanding to 8 majority and 4 minority in the final 15 days.
Several members urged more study before altering long-standing practice. Representative Pace and others said the change was "a really major change" that merited interim review rather than immediate adoption.
Floor procedure yielded to motions to amend and to 'circle' the first substitute—effectively pausing immediate final action so members could work on revisions. The sponsor said he welcomed amendments and expected the measure to evolve.
The debate highlights a broader tension: sponsors said recent years have shifted technical control to legislative staff and fiscal analysts, and HJR 18 is intended to reclaim more direct legislative oversight. Critics worried the change could politicize decisions that have traditionally balanced majority and minority representation.
