Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Renewable Energy topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Utah House advances renewable-energy sales-tax exemption after debate over fiscal impact
Summary
The Utah House approved a third-substitute bill to create a sales and use tax exemption for renewable-energy production equipment after debate over a revised fiscal analysis and an amendment to include hydroelectric power in the definition of renewable energy.
Salt Lake City — The Utah House approved third-substitute House Bill 89 on third reading, advancing a sales-and-use-tax exemption for equipment used in renewable-energy production.
Representative James Gowans, the bill sponsor, told colleagues the bill "deals with modifying the sales and use tax to create an exemption related to renewable energy production facilities," and said the measure was intended to help Utah companies compete with renewable-energy projects in neighboring states. Gowans said the bill's fiscal note had been changed in rules and that the fiscal analyst's office had produced an amended analysis showing a current fiscal note of zero.
But Gowans and other members also discussed longer-term fiscal effects. Gowans cited the fiscal analyst's estimate that "for every 100 megawatt hours built or expanded in the future, the state would lose 4 and a half million in potential general revenue and 1,660,000 to local governments," while also describing projected local economic gains during construction and ongoing property-tax and royalty benefits.
Representative Snow moved to add "hydroelectric" to the bill's definition of renewable energy, arguing the change would more fully reflect renewable-energy sources. Snow acknowledged uncertainty about the fiscal consequences of adding large-scale hydroelectric production and said the fiscal note "scares me too" but that the definition change was fundamentally about accuracy.
Supporters emphasized economic-development benefits for rural Utah, noting projected construction jobs and local spending tied to sizable renewable projects. Opponents urged caution about future revenue impacts and asked for clarity on how the loss to the general fund would be realized over time.
The House adopted amendments on the floor, debated technical points and then moved to previous question to end debate before voting. The bill will be returned to the Senate for concurrence with the House's final floor actions or for signature as required by the legislative process.
Why it matters: HB 89 would make equipment purchases for renewable-energy facilities exempt from state sales tax, a change sponsors argue will spur competition and economic development but that also carries potential long-term revenue implications for state and local governments.
