House rejects bill to expand use of unmarked Utah Highway Patrol vehicles

Representative Bowman brought Senate Bill 106 to the floor, describing the proposal as an amendment to the motor vehicle code to permit the Utah Highway Patrol to deploy more than one unmarked vehicle in organized operations in first- and second-class counties, with superintendent approval, for enforcement of aggressive driving, intoxication-related crashes, reckless driving and speeding 21 miles per hour or more over the limit. "This act modifies the motor vehicle code to allow highway patrol to use more than 1 unmarked vehicle in an organized operation to enforce traffic laws," the sponsor said.

Several representatives spoke for and against the bill. Representative Dunigan described a reported impersonation incident involving red-and-blue lights painted on a vehicle that led to a dangerous stop and expressed concern that unmarked cars that use lights could put citizens at risk: "I do like the part in the bill that says that the peace officers must clearly be in uniform... But I'm a little uncomfortable in having the unmarked cars... around somebody flashes red and blue lights. ... And then, you're putting yourself in jeopardy." Another representative (unnamed in the transcript) described a personal near-impersonation experience and said they would advise family to drive directly to a police station rather than comply with an unmarked vehicle.

Supporters including Representative Wallow argued unmarked vehicles are a deterrent to aggressive drivers on congested highways. The sponsor responded that the change would not apply in rural areas, would be limited to first- and second-class counties, and would require approval of the commissioner of public safety for targeted "blitz" operations.

After debate the House voted; the clerk announced, "Senate Bill 106, having received 29 yes votes and 38 no votes, fails to pass and will be returned to the Senate."