Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Water Security topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

House approves bill letting water utilities require criminal background checks, after narrowing scope

Utah House of Representatives · February 19, 2003
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The House passed legislation permitting political subdivisions that operate public water systems to require criminal background checks of applicants, employees and contractors, with an amendment requiring utilities to set written criteria and to limit checks to roles that can affect system safety.

The Utah House on Feb. 18 approved a measure that allows political subdivisions operating public water systems to require criminal background checks for prospective employees, contractors and others who seek access to water facilities, backers said.

Supporters said the bill, presented by Representative Hogue, focuses on protecting water infrastructure while giving local utilities flexibility. "This particular bill authorizes political subdivisions that operate public water systems to require prospective and current employees and also contractors and those seeking access to public water facilities to submit to a criminal background check," the sponsor told the chamber.

Debate centered on how far the requirement should reach. Lawmakers worried the text could be read to require checks for meter readers and other workers with no access to critical equipment. Representative 1 offered a floor amendment requiring each public water utility "prepare criteria for which criminal activity will preclude employment and shall provide written notice to the person." The sponsor supported the change and lawmakers adopted it unanimously.

Another amendment added a limiting phrase so that utilities may require checks only if the applicant "will be in a position to affect the utility system safety," a move backers said would exclude low‑access roles. During floor debate, one member urged a definition to avoid treating meter readers as needing checks, saying the bill as written was otherwise "way, way too far reaching." The sponsor replied the bill gives utilities latitude to require checks where warranted.

After technical housekeeping and a brief period of circling the bill for drafting tweaks, the House returned the measure as amended and recorded a final vote of 65 yes, 1 no, 9 absent.

Next steps: the amended bill was sent back to the Senate for further action.