Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Transportation topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Bill would let county commissioners place gates on some county roads; sponsor says access not restricted

Utah House of Representatives · February 21, 2003
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

House sponsor Michael E. Noel said House Bill 242 would let county commissioners place gates across D-class county roads to reduce fencing costs for landowners; he emphasized gates may not be locked and access remains, though the transcript does not include a floor vote tally in this excerpt.

House Bill 242, titled in the clerk’s reading as a measure on "protection of rights of way — gates on county roads," was presented on the floor with sponsor remarks from Michael E. Noel.

Noel described the change as a technical revision to the transportation code that expands an existing allowance for county commissions to erect gates on B roads so that the same discretion applies to D roads. He said the change aims to save landowners the cost of fencing entire rights-of-way in rural areas and cited "some practical values" such as cost savings and avoiding the need to fence highway right-of-way.

Members asked whether the bill would affect lingering quiet-title disputes under RS 24-77 and whether gates could impair public access. Representative Becker asked about RS 24-77 implications; Noel said it "really doesn't have any implications" for the quiet-title action. Representative Shurtleff asked whether gates could block access to public land; Noel replied that the statute already allows gates on B roads and that the bill would only add D roads, that gates cannot be locked (violating which is a misdemeanor), and that access would require only stopping to open the gate.

The clerk noted the bill had a favorable committee report in Transportation. The transcript records that voting on House Bill 242 was opened and closed on the floor, but a final floor tally is not recorded in this excerpt.

The floor discussion focused on access protections and the discretionary role of county commissions; no amendment or final floor result is recorded in the available transcript excerpt.