Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Education School Fees topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Utah House approves small per-waiver payment for hard-hit districts; bill now heads to Senate
Summary
After extended floor debate, the Utah House passed House Bill 69 to provide up to $40 per school fee waiver (estimated $400,000 annually) to help districts with large numbers of waivers; supporters said the measure raises awareness and offers limited relief while critics warned it may broadly subsidize non-classroom costs.
Representative Shurtleff, sponsor of House Bill 69, told the Utah House on Feb. 11 that the bill would return up to $40 for each school fee waiver in heavily affected districts, with an annual allocation of about $400,000 to offset local losses.
The measure targets districts that lose substantial per-school revenue when many students qualify for fee waivers. Shurtleff cited individual school shortfalls, saying Highland High "lost over $68,000 last year in fee waivers" and "Ogden High and Ben Lomond High each lost $50,000." She said the $40 payment would not fully replace lost funds but could help schools most affected.
Supporters argued the bill merely starts a conversation in the Legislature and asks appropriators and the Senate to consider the proposal. "This is an issue that will keep coming back if something isn't done," Representative Morgan said, urging colleagues to move the measure forward even if full funding is not immediately available.
Opponents pressed for stricter audit and eligibility checks. Representative Eurer highlighted a discrepancy between figures in the sponsor's handout and the fiscal note: "I noticed in the paper that you handed out, the total is $241,000 ... but the fiscal note on the bill is for over $400,000." Representative Wallace and others pushed for stronger verification procedures after local principals reported cases of inconsistent applications and suggested some applicants did not truly qualify.
The sponsor and other proponents said eligibility is tied to the statutory free-lunch standard and that local enforcement practices vary; Shurtleff said principals sometimes review and reapply cases and that documentation (commonly a free-lunch certificate) is typically checked. Representative Mascaro described local principals' efforts to verify applications and urged awareness of the administrative burden placed on schools.
Procedurally, the House called the previous question to cut off debate, a call of the House was used to secure a quorum amid voting-button issues, and the roll was closed for a final recorded vote. House Bill 69 passed the House by 39 yes to 33 no and will be referred to the Senate for further consideration.
The House record shows members on both sides acknowledged limited state resources; proponents said passing the bill would at least surface the problem for appropriators and the Senate, while critics said the state should not broadly underwrite extracurricular or non-core fees without clearer audit safeguards.
Next steps: HB69 will move to the Utah Senate where it may receive committee consideration and further fiscal review.
