Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Administrative Procedures topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
House debate: bill would remove water-well drillers from Administrative Procedures Act to speed enforcement
Summary
Representative Darren Peterson presented House Bill 91 to remove water-well drillers from the Administrative Procedures Act, arguing the typical speed of water-well drilling can render administrative hearings ineffective; members asked whether the change raises safety or groundwater concerns.
Representative Darren Peterson presented House Bill 91 on the floor, explaining the bill would take water-well drillers out from under the Administrative Procedures Act. Peterson said the Administrative Procedures Act can produce lengthy hearings while water-well drilling can be completed in days, after which the state may have little remedy for potential harm to aquifers.
Peterson told members the state engineer’s office raised concerns primarily about protection of underground aquifers; he said removing water-well drillers from the Act would not have been intended to eliminate safety oversight, but to ensure timely enforcement and prevent situations where the driller completes a well and leaves before an administrative remedy is available.
Questioners pressed the sponsor on safety implications and whether the bill was intended to address broader well-driller safety standards; the sponsor said safety concerns exist but were not the primary purpose of this legislation, which is narrowly targeted at enforcement timing and aquifer protection.
The transcript records the sponsor’s presentation, questions from members, a waived summation, and the opening of a vote; the final vote tally for HB 91 is not recorded in the excerpt provided.
