Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Electronic Waste topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Utah House rejects bill to centralize electronic-waste guidance after fiscal concerns
Summary
The House rejected HB67, a bill to coordinate electronic-equipment recycling and disposal guidance via the Department of Environmental Quality. Sponsors said the measure would create a focused web resource; opponents warned it could add work amid existing DEQ shortfalls and duplicate current programs.
Get email alerts on the Electronic Waste topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The Utah House on Jan. 28 voted down House Bill 67, a measure to centralize guidance and coordination for the disposal and recycling of electronic equipment.
Representative Ralph Becker, sponsor of the bill, told the chamber the proposal would create an informational web resource so residents could find proper ways to dispose of electronics and identify local recycling recipients. Becker said the measure was designed to address hazardous materials in electronics, including lead, cadmium and mercury, and to do so with no new fiscal burden: "The fiscal note on this bill is 0, because the department is already working in this area," Becker said.
Opponents raised concerns about administrative burden and overlapping authority. Representative Bigelow asked how much work state departments would be expected to absorb. Representative Bennion noted reports that the Department of Environmental Quality faced restricted-fund shortfalls and moved an amendment adding a sunset date to the bill so the Legislature could review the program’s impact.
Becker described the amendment as friendly and said a review period would be healthy, but debate continued over whether the Department could handle new coordination work while managing existing deficits. After discussion and summation, voting on HB67 closed at 33 yes and 39 no; the bill failed to pass the House.
The sponsor emphasized the intent to help constituents access recycling options and to protect public health by addressing hazardous wastes embedded in electronic equipment. The outcome leaves current local and county programs as the primary means for electronic-equipment disposal in Utah without the proposed statewide web-focused coordination.
