Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Capital Projects topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
House amends and approves capital‑project language to require O&M funding proof
Summary
Lawmakers amended and passed first substitute House Bill 226 to require projects funded or facilitated through trust lands or private donations to show operations and maintenance funding; amendment replacing 'provide' with 'fund construction of' passed and the bill cleared the House 64-6.
The Utah House on the floor amended and passed first substitute House Bill 226, changing language on page 3, line 87 to require that funds be demonstrated to "fund construction of" proposed facilities rather than simply "provide" them. Representative David Ewer, sponsor, said the change tightens the bill so that when organizations or departments build facilities with non‑legislative funding they must show that operations and maintenance (O&M) funding is identified so the state will not inherit ongoing costs.
"What we're attempting to do…is allow the school trust land people to work within the system of building a building…and still follow the same guidelines…that there has to be funding in place for MNO," Ewer said, explaining the amendment was intended to prevent projects from later imposing O&M demands on the legislature. He gave the University of Utah Hospital as an example of an institution that might use the change to build facilities while preserving budgetary clarity.
The House agreed to the amendment by voice vote, the bill was read as amended, and the clerk recorded 64 yes votes and 6 no votes; the measure will be forwarded to the Senate for further consideration.
