Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Alcoholic Beverage Control topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
House approves broad alcohol‑control revisions after debate over pitcher limits
Summary
The House amended and passed Senate Bill 58, a 135‑page Alcoholic Beverage Control reform package, after debate over limits on single‑service sizes (one liter vs. pitchers) and several failed amendment motions; SB58 passed 57‑14 and will be forwarded to the Senate.
Get email alerts on the Alcoholic Beverage Control topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The Utah House on May 17 approved Senate Bill 58, a 135‑page package of amendments to the state’s Alcoholic Beverage Control laws that sponsors described as technical cleanups and fixes to gaps in last year’s statute. The bill, as amended on the floor, passed 57 yes to 14 no and will be sent back to the Senate.
Sponsor Representative Ron Urquhart (appearing in the transcript as Representative Urquhart) told the House the bill fixes “a lot of holes” in the state’s alcohol laws and includes numerous small changes across the code. Early on the floor members adopted Amendment 1 under Urquhart’s name to remove provisions related to compensation and benefits; that amendment was agreed to before extended debate began on service‑size limits.
A central point of contention was a provision limiting the amount of alcohol that may be served to a patron at one time. Supporters of the limit, including Urquhart, said the one‑liter standard helps bartenders and establishments regulate consumption and reduce dram‑shop liability, arguing that it provides a sensible line for servers to enforce. “If I serve people too much alcohol and they get drunk and go out and kill someone, we have dram‑shop liability,” Urquhart said in floor remarks supporting the change.
Opponents, including Representative McCartney, urged reinstating prior language allowing pitchers, calling the restriction “unfriendly to our visitors and to our citizens” and saying responsible patrons should not be penalized. McCartney offered an amendment to restore the prior wording; the motion to reinstate was defeated on the floor, failing 23 yes to 43 no.
Members also debated an amendment by Representative Biskupski that would have deleted a requirement to notify the commission when managers change at licensed establishments. Biskupski argued frequent managerial turnover would make reporting unduly burdensome, while Urquhart and others said manager notification helps ensure compliance by the people actually serving alcohol. That amendment likewise failed on the floor.
With the key amendment fights decided, Urquhart closed debate and the House recorded a final tally of 57 yes and 14 no on SB58. The bill, as amended, will be forwarded to the Senate for further consideration.
Quotes in this article are taken from floor remarks recorded in the official transcript of the House proceedings.
