Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Workers Compensation topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

House passes amended Second Substitute Senate Bill 165 on workers' compensation after debate over reinsurance and WCF authority

Utah House of Representatives · March 3, 2004
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The Utah House amended and passed Second Substitute Senate Bill 165, adding provisions clarifying reinsurance authority for the Workers' Compensation Fund and auditing powers; key amendments were adopted after members raised concerns about other states' jurisdiction and subsidiary activity.

The Utah House of Representatives on March 2 amended and passed Second Substitute Senate Bill 165, a workers' compensation measure that includes provisions on reinsurance, residual market authority and oversight of the Workers' Compensation Fund (WCF).

Representative Alexander, who led the floor consideration, moved to 'uncircle' the bill and pressed the House to adopt a package of amendments intended to resolve disputes flagged by another state's regulator. "I hope you will support this legislation," Alexander said in urging passage, adding the House may return to the Senate with changes.

Representative Viskupski moved Amendment Number 3, which he said "will clarify the resolution of the Idaho problem," give the insurance commissioner authority to define the residual market and audit for compliance, require policyholders to elect all board members of Advantage, prevent Advantage from selling insurance in Utah, and clarify personal enrichment provisions. The House adopted that amendment by voice vote after the sponsor said the changes came from the insurance commissioner.

A substitute amendment from Representative Styler (Amendment Number 4) expanded the language to address reinsurance "related to workers' compensation risk" for Utah employers and their employees, "except as limited by the laws of another jurisdiction." Representative Dennegan and others asked whether that clause would allow another state (for example, Idaho) to limit WCF's operations in Utah. Styler and other sponsors clarified the provision applies to reinsurance for Utah employers and their employees and is not intended to authorize the WCF to engage in unrelated business activity outside Utah.

To address the concerns, the sponsor modified the substitute to insert the words "for employees outside of this state" after the word "jurisdiction," a change members accepted as a clarification. Representative Hansen paused floor business for a personal-privilege welcome to visiting students before debate concluded.

After final summations, the clerk announced the vote on Second Substitute Senate Bill 165: 68 yes, 1 no. The bill passed the House and will return to the Senate for further consideration.

Key procedural and technical points discussed on the floor included whether the reinsurance language applied to the WCF parent or its Advantage subsidiary, how the insurance commissioner's requested changes would affect the residual market, and the WCF's corporate status. Sponsors repeatedly described the amendments as responses to the insurance commissioner and as efforts to preserve the underlying policy purpose of workers' compensation.

The House also handled multiple concurrence and conference-committee matters before recessing for lunch; those actions are summarized separately.