Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Court Fee Adjustments topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
House reconsiders and passes court fee adjustments after procedural fight
Summary
Following a successful motion to reconsider, the House approved a second substitute of Senate Bill 196 on court fee adjustments that standardizes use of fines to fund court security and clarifies county/city jail arrangements; vote on final second substitute: 42-27.
Members reopened consideration of first substitute Senate Bill 196 under a procedural motion and ultimately approved a second substitute version of the bill addressing court fee adjustments and jail service arrangements.
Representative Yer led the effort to bring the bill back for reconsideration, saying cities and counties had reached agreement and requested another hearing. "This is a user tax," Yer told colleagues as he urged reconsideration, framing the measure as a way to let offenders who generate the need for court security help pay for those services.
Opponents said the measure had been debated and decided recently and warned about turning fines into a recurring surcharge. Representative Hughes said he opposed reconsideration because the chamber had already considered the bill in detail. Representative Hogue and others objected that the proposal functioned like a surcharge and said municipalities already receive portions of fines.
A floor sponsor explained the substance of the substitute: counties will operate jails and accept prisoners from cities without discrimination, and the bill adjusts fine and fee distributions so fines can be used to fund security services rather than relying on local general funds. The sponsor illustrated differences in existing fine allocations, noting, for example, that a wrong-side-of-the-road fine in state court is $82 with $32 of that used for security while some local courts receive different amounts.
After procedural votes and floor debate, the House substituted the second substitute for first substitute SB 196 and then approved the measure; the transcript reports the second substitute passed 42 yes and 27 no. The bill will be returned to the Senate for further consideration.
What happens next: The second substitute SB 196, as passed by the House, will be transmitted to the Senate for further action; sponsors asked the chambers' enrollment offices to process the substitution and return the bill for signatures.
