Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Economic Development topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

House delays vote on film-equipment sales-tax exemption after fiscal-note concerns

Utah House of Representatives · February 27, 2004
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Lawmakers debated a Senate-conveyed bill to exempt film and production equipment from state and local sales-and-use taxes; supporters argued it would attract productions, while fiscal staff absence of a written fiscal note led to a motion to circle the bill for further review.

First substitute Senate Bill 190, a proposed sales-and-use tax exemption intended to attract film and television production to Utah, was presented to the House and then circled for further action after members raised fiscal concerns and questions about revenue impact.

An unidentified floor speaker introduced the measure on behalf of the sponsor and said the bill would exempt certain machinery, equipment, leases and rentals related to production and post-production. "We used to do a lot of filmmaking in Southern Utah... The problem is the sales tax and use tax," the speaker said, arguing the exemption would help the state compete with neighboring states.

Representative Keiser voiced support, citing prior productions and saying exempting selected purchases could return significant sales tax revenue to the state from increased production activity: "...about $20,000,000 in sales tax had come to the state over the time that they're in production," Keiser said. By contrast, Representative Bigelow said the fiscal note had not been attached to the bill on the computer; he said fiscal staff verbally told him the measure would cost an ongoing $250,000 to the state budget and therefore he opposed advancing it without a written fiscal note.

Following floor questioning and a motion to circle the bill so the fiscal office could produce written documentation, the House voted to circle First Substitute Senate Bill 190 rather than take it up immediately. The motion to circle will delay final action and allow fiscal staff and sponsors to clarify the magnitude and source of any budget impact before further consideration.

Next steps: the bill is held (circled) for additional fiscal analysis; sponsors signaled willingness to work with fiscal staff and to return with documented fiscal notes before a final vote.