Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Hb142 Audit Requirements topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
House approves substitute to clarify audits for political subdivisions
Summary
The House adopted a first substitute to House Bill 142 to add a 'review' level of financial oversight and clarify the state auditor’s authority to require audits or reviews for component units; the measure passed 71–0 and moves to the Senate.
Representative Ferry moved and explained the first substitute to House Bill 142, saying the change replaces the phrase "analysis of financial statements" with a defined term, "accounting report," and explicitly adds a review level consistent with generally accepted accounting principles. The substitute also requires preservation of audit history and working papers and clarifies the state auditor's authority to require audits of component units and to adopt rules governing audit thresholds.
Ferry said the bill responds to rising audit costs that can burden political subdivisions; he described the current statutory thresholds as outdated and noted the state auditor participated in drafting changes. When asked whether political subdivisions objected, Ferry acknowledged concerns from counties and some special service districts but emphasized the bill includes petitioning processes and rulemaking authority so affected entities could request different audit levels.
In summation, Ferry said approximately 87 audits are currently required and about 34 would fall under the review process after the bill; he argued the change would ease financial burdens for entities with clean records without compromising public confidence. The House approved the first substitute 71–0; the bill will be forwarded to the Senate.
