Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Election Process topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
House splits over limiting midterm vacancy recommendations to a single name
Summary
Lawmakers debated first substitute House Bill 40, which would require party nominating units to submit a single candidate name for midterm vacancies; proponents said it clarifies party process while opponents warned it could override local bylaws and hand too much influence to the executive branch.
Representatives spent much of the morning on a contentious procedural change to the way midterm vacancies are handled by political parties. Sponsor Representative Frank asked the House to concur with Senate amendments that would narrow the range of names submitted for a midterm vacancy so the executive branch receives one recommended name rather than one to three options.
Opponents, including Representative Christiansen, said limiting the recommendation to a single name could override local party bylaws and invite “mischief” at the local level by removing protections built into party selection processes. Supporters argued that parties should be able to enshrine in their own bylaws how many names they submit and that clarity could reduce confusion in multi-county districts.
Floor action reflected the split. The motion to concur with the Senate substitute failed on the floor; members then considered a motion to refuse to concur and ask the Senate to recede. Representative Ferry moved that course and asked for authorization to appoint a conference committee if necessary. After further debate about local control, the motion to refuse to concur recorded 34 yes votes and 38 no votes and failed. The Speaker indicated the matter would be readdressed the next morning to give sponsors a chance to continue negotiations.
No changes to state law were finalized on the floor during this session; the chamber left the matter pending further work or a conference committee.
