Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Election Dates topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
House approves narrower schedule for special bond elections after lengthy debate
Summary
The House voted to limit special election dates for bond measures after extended debate and failed amendments that sought to preserve local flexibility; final passage was 47-21. Sponsors argued the change will increase turnout and reduce costs; opponents said it removes local control.
Representative Troy Harper, sponsor of Senate Bill 115, said the proposal would reduce the number of special-election dates used for bond votes and improve turnout and public information. Harper said the measure enjoyed support from school boards and other parties and aimed to reduce the fiscal burden of multiple elections.
Opponents repeatedly argued the bill reduces local flexibility. Representative Shurtleff highlighted an instance of high turnout in a February bond election and urged retaining more scheduling options; Representative Allen and Representative Murray warned the bill could hamper local districts’ ability to time issues with market conditions or local needs.
Representative Hogue offered two amendments: one to preserve a quick path for land-use referendums and a second to make measures effective immediately if passed by two-thirds of the House. The amendments were debated at length; division motions and substitute amendments were voted on. A substitute motion to amend failed by recorded vote (24 yes, 42 no), and subsequent amendments (numbered 2 and 3 in floor paperwork) were rejected in separate recorded votes. House debate featured exchange about turnout figures (sponsors cited low turnout rates historically; opponents cited counterexamples showing strong February turnout in some contests).
After debate and the failure of amendment proposals, the House passed Senate Bill 115 on final reading 47-21. The bill returns to the Senate for further action.
