Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Tax Policy topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Utah House repeals cable and satellite tax after extended debate; bill advances to Senate
Summary
The Utah House voted 71-3 to repeal last year’s cable and satellite sales tax, citing federal relief and competitive inequities between satellite and cable providers. The repeal carries a fiscal note of about $14 million and will be sent to the Senate for consideration.
Get email alerts on the Tax Policy topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
SALT LAKE CITY — The Utah House voted 71-3 to repeal a recently enacted cable and satellite sales tax on Tuesday, a move sponsors said was justified by federal budget relief and concerns about unequal tax treatment of competing providers.
Representative Greg Curtis, sponsor of House Bill 38, told colleagues the Legislature imposed the tax last year to meet budget needs but that federal tax-relief funds had since arrived. “If we are going to pass a tax to help balance the budget, and if we then subsequently receive fiscal relief from the federal government in the tune of $100,000,000, we should repeal the tax,” Curtis said during floor debate. The bill carries a fiscal note of about $14,000,000.
Curtis and other supporters also argued the state Tax Commission’s guidance has treated satellite services differently from cable, creating an unfair competitive imbalance. Curtis said that the commission indicated local-option sales tax could not be imposed on satellite broadcasts while cable remained subject to the local option, producing an inequity between the two services.
Opponents pressed broader policy questions. Representative Christiansen and others asked whether the action effectively rescinds a prior policy decision or simply removes a recently added tax, and raised concerns about whether exemptions and original policy rationales (for example, exemptions related to the public‑interest role of certain media) had been adequately examined. Several members described the original imposition as a revenue-driven response to a temporary budget gap and urged attention to the policy principle behind exemptions.
Curtis acknowledged the haste of last year’s process and said he sought to return tax policy to voters when the revenue need ended. “We should return the tax,” he said in his summation.
The House adopted HB38 and will forward the bill to the Senate for further consideration.
