Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Family Policy Divorce topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
House approves task force to study causes and costs of divorce after extended floor debate
Summary
First substitute House Bill 56 establishes an interim task force to study the causes, costs and possible legal/process changes related to divorce in Utah; sponsor Representative Peggy Wallace emphasized child welfare and fiscal costs; the House passed the measure 62-12.
Get email alerts on the Family Policy Divorce topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The Utah House approved first substitute House Bill 56, creating a task force to study the causes of divorce, explore track systems and waiting periods, review fiscal impacts on the courts, and make recommendations to the judiciary. Representative Peggy Wallace, the bill sponsor, argued the state bears significant fiscal and social costs from divorce and that an interim study is needed to compile facts and propose measured changes.
"Divorce really does involve government," Representative Wallace said on the floor, citing court fees and social-service costs tied to single-parent families and welfare programs. She outlined task-force duties including examining irreconcilable-differences provisions, waiting periods, child-custody and support presumptions, and fiscal calculations for courts and state assistance programs.
Opponents warned against government intrusion and questioned the cost. Representative Moss said she feared the task force would spend state money to collect personal divorce stories and urged defeat, saying she did not want the state to spend $12,760 for the task force to hear 'dozens and dozens of horror stories.' Supporters countered with social and economic rationales, pointing to long-term studies on family outcomes and the potential for new policies to reduce negative impacts on children.
The House cut off debate by agreeing to the previous question and then passed the task-force bill by a recorded vote of 62 yes and 12 no; the measure will be referred to the Senate for further consideration.
