Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Annual Appropriations topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
House approves Annual Appropriations Act after floor debate over $70 million transportation allocation
Summary
The Utah House passed House Bill 1, the Annual Appropriations Act, 55-18 after floor debate and a failed amendment that would have converted $30 million of a $70 million ongoing transportation allocation to one-time general funds for other priorities.
Get email alerts on the Annual Appropriations topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The Utah House of Representatives voted to approve House Bill 1, the Annual Appropriations Act, following floor debate over how to treat a $70 million ongoing allocation for transportation. The bill passed the House 55-18 and was referred to the Senate for consideration.
Representative Ron Bigelow, sponsor of the bill, opened debate with a procedural overview and line-by-line guidance for new members, explaining the bill’s line-item structure and how funds are restricted to their designated line items. He identified an example line item that includes "71,000,000 of general funds, 1,900,000 of federal funds" and emphasized that program dollars may be moved within a line item but not out of it.
Representative Becker offered an amendment to reduce a transportation-related ongoing amount and convert part of it to one-time general-fund spending. The amendment would have deleted 129,594,700 and inserted 59,594,700 on page 63 (and added a new one-time General Fund line for $40,000,000), and adjusted another line to 209,023,500. Becker framed the amendment as a question of priorities, saying the body should "plan ahead for our other important state needs, education being at the top of our list."
Representative Bigelow opposed the amendment, saying a vote for the bill did not mean transportation was the state's single priority and urging members to keep the "balanced approach" reflected in the bill. He noted the bill locks down base budgets that had been vetted in committee and said the $70,000,000 ongoing transportation allocation was part of that balance.
Other members debated the timing and prudence of using ongoing versus one-time funds. Representative McGee urged waiting for updated revenue projections from the Fiscal Analyst Office and the governor’s budget office before making changes. Representative Alexander warned against spending one-time funds that would not recur in future years.
The House voted on the amendment by voice, and the presiding officer ruled the amendment failed. The House then proceeded to final consideration of House Bill 1. After Representative Bigelow’s summation, the House opened and closed voting; the reading clerk announced the final tally: 55 yes, 18 no. The bill passed the House and will move to the Senate.
Action and next steps: House Bill 1 passed the House and was referred to the Senate for further consideration. Any future adjustments to the $70,000,000 allocation could be made in subsequent bills or amendments during the session.
