Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Child Welfare topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
House approves repeal of juvenile-code 'presumption of responsibility' after lengthy debate
Summary
The Utah House voted 47-25 to repeal a juvenile-code provision commonly called the "presumption of responsibility," a move sponsors said restores the presumption of innocence while opponents warned it could reduce tools used to protect children. The bill now goes to the Senate.
The Utah House on Feb. 3 voted 47-25 to approve House Bill 89, a stand-alone repeal of a juvenile-code provision commonly described as a "presumption of responsibility" for caregivers who had "direct and exclusive care and control" of an abused child. Representative Gavr Christiansen, the sponsor, said the statute shifts the evidentiary burden onto parents.
"In our zeal to make sure that we detect every possible instance of abuse somehow along the way into our statute has crept this code provision entitled presumption of responsibility, which I would submit to you as a nice way of saying presumption of guilt," Christiansen said during his floor presentation.
Supporters argued the repeal preserves a fundamental due-process principle. Christiansen and other backers told colleagues prosecutors can still bring circumstantial cases but would not begin proceedings by presuming a caregiver responsible.
Opponents said the provision serves as a tool to protect children when a caregiver has exclusive control of a child and that removing it could reduce the state's ability to act. Representative Lawrence said, "in my heart, this feels wrong to me," and urged caution, arguing the statute expresses a form of responsibility appropriate when a child cannot testify. Representative Mascaro and Representative Litback expressed concern for children's safety and urged careful consideration of practice, not just statutory language.
Members questioned whether the change would alter day-to-day practice. The sponsor and others said prosecutors and the attorney general's office had not opposed repeal in committee and that existing procedures and evidentiary tools would still be available to protect minors.
After extended exchanges among Representatives Wyatt, Romero, Lawrence, Mascaro, Litback, Harper, Fisher and others, the House voted to adopt the previous question and then to pass HB 89 by the recorded tally of 47 yes, 25 no, 3 absent. The bill will be transmitted to the Senate for further consideration.
Supporters framed the change as a correction of an evidentiary anomaly; opponents framed it as a choice between parental rights and child protection. The House record shows both lines of concern will travel with the bill to the Senate.
