Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Transportation Funding topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

House Passes Bill Creating Centennial Highway TIF, Moves $30M One‑Time and Codifies $60M Ongoing

Utah House of Representatives · April 20, 2005
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

House Bill 108—creating a TIF, moving a $30 million one‑time appropriation into that TIF and codifying $60 million of ongoing funds into the Centennial Highway Fund—passed the House 61–12 after floor debate over earmarking and legislative flexibility.

The Utah House passed House Bill 108 on April 19, a transportation funding measure that creates a tax‑increment‑finance (TIF) mechanism, moves a $30 million one‑time appropriation into the TIF, and codifies $60 million of ongoing funding into the Centennial Highway Fund. The House voted 61 yes to 12 no and referred the bill to the Senate for further consideration.

Representative Lockhart, the bill sponsor, summarized the measure and its fiscal effects: "What the bill does is everything except for the box at the bottom ... It creates the TIF. It puts the 30,000,000 one‑time into the TIF. It codifies $60,000,000 of ongoing money into the Centennial Highway Fund, and it ... remains silent on the 90,000,000 ongoing." The sponsor emphasized that the bill moves the previously appropriated one‑time money into a new funding vehicle and that an existing $90 million ongoing commitment was not removed but not codified by the bill.

Floor debate focused on whether the change amounted to earmarking or simply establishing benchmarks and whether state legislators should preserve flexibility to respond to future priorities such as water projects or mass transit. One member told colleagues that preallocating revenues risks tying lawmakers’ hands, while supporters, including members of the appropriations and transportation task force, argued that transportation needs lack a natural constituency and require structural protections.

During the procedural sequence earlier on the floor, members discussed and adopted technical amendments (amendment number 2 was adopted in a voice vote to correct fiscal line items). A recorded division occurred during a motion to reconsider an earlier amendment; the motion to reconsider failed by a narrow margin (36 yes, 37 no), leaving the prior action in place.

The House clerk announced final passage: "House Bill 108 ... having received 61 yes votes, 12 no votes, passes this body and will be referred to the Senate for further consideration." The bill was then moved to the Senate calendar under suspension of the rules.

Next steps: HB108 proceeds to the Senate for consideration and possible further amendment. Lawmakers on the floor said they expect continued negotiations over transportation funding priorities and implementation details.