Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Tourism Funding topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
House approves tourism-funding bill after debate over earmarking and future budget priorities
Summary
The House passed the first substitute of Senate Bill 1002 on tourism funding by 51–17 after heated debate over earmarking revenue streams and whether tourism should be prioritized following education.
The Utah House voted to pass the first substitute of Senate Bill 1002, a measure establishing dedicated funding for tourism promotion, by a recorded vote of 51 yes and 17 no. Supporters described the bill as performance-based and designed to return economic benefits; opponents criticized its earmarking of future revenue streams and warned it would bind successors.
Representative Fairey introduced the bill and said amendments were expected. Representative Lockhart strongly opposed the earmarks, arguing they "bind" future members and saying, "This money's gonna go to tourism" and asking whether the Legislature should set tourism directly behind education in priorities. Lockhart said he could not tell constituents he supported that priority.
Representative Shortland, speaking in favor, said tourism has been underfunded and argued the state risks falling behind competitors that spend more on tourism promotion; she supported the measure as a way to bring returns on investment. A motion for the previous question closed debate; Representative Ferry provided a summation, describing the bill as "performance based" with tracking to measure the impact of tourism promotion.
After the vote the clerk recorded a tally of 51 yes and 17 no. The speaker will sign the bill and refer it to the Senate for the president's signature.
What happens next: the bill moves to the Senate for signature; opponents flagged concerns about the long-term effect of earmarks and whether municipal or other spending priorities might be constrained.
