Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Workers Compensation topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
House OKs study of firefighter and drug‑officer occupational risks
Summary
The House passed a second substitute to HB 9 directing a study (funded from a workplace safety special fund) into firefighters' and drug‑task officers' worker‑compensation and related health risks, citing elevated cancer incidence among firefighters and the need for Utah‑specific research.
Representative Murray presented second substitute House Bill 9 to fund studies on workers'‑compensation issues for firefighters and drug enforcement officers. Murray said the study will be funded from a Labor Commission special fund for workplace‑safety studies, not the general fund, and noted prior efforts had failed in the Senate. He cited evidence that firefighters face higher cancer risks and said the study would identify Utah‑specific occupational exposures and needs.
Debate addressed the source of funding (a 0.25% premium tax that funds workplace safety programs), whether the workers' compensation advisory council had recommended waiting and the balance in the workplace safety account. Representative Clark and others argued the fund balance is sufficient and that the Labor Commission and fund commission support the study. Representative Noel raised concerns about diverting funds from broader workplace safety programs; supporters said the dedicated account has a balance sufficient to fund the study without impairing other work.
The bill passed the House 56–14 and will be referred to the Senate.
What it means: The House authorized a targeted study into occupational disease potential for firefighters and drug officers, aiming to produce evidence for possible policy or presumptive‑benefit changes.
Next steps: The Labor Commission will administer the study using the designated workplace safety account.
