Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Tax Policy topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

House approves SB 4,001, creating optional single-rate income tax and expanding brackets; final vote 49-25-1

Utah House of Representatives · September 19, 2006
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

After hours of debate over fiscal impact and education funding, the Utah House passed Senate Bill 4,001, which expands tax brackets and creates an optional 5.35% single-rate individual income tax; several amendments adjusted the top marginal rate and funding timing before final passage, 49-25-1.

The Utah House voted to pass Senate Bill 4,001, titled “Income Tax Amendments,” sending the measure back to the Senate after a 49–25–1 roll-call vote. The bill, sponsored in the House by Representative Harper, expands several income-tax brackets and creates an optional single-rate individual income tax that taxpayers may elect to use in place of the multi-bracket system.

Representative Harper told colleagues the bill does two things: it broadens bracket ranges (Harper described the expansion as roughly 28%) to provide a tax break to every Utah taxpayer who files a return, and it creates an optional flat-rate tax of 5.35%. Harper said the bracket expansion would produce a roughly $40 million reduction in the fiscal year labeled '08 and that the full implementation fiscal estimate is about $76 million.

Floor debate focused on whether the package fairly targeted middle-income households and on tradeoffs between returning revenue to taxpayers and preserving funds for public education. Representative Dunnigan offered Amendment 2, which reduced the top marginal rate for those remaining in the multi-bracket system and shifted some bracket expansion dollars to provide modest middle-income relief. Supporters said the amendment would help middle-income Utahns and kept the overall fiscal profile close to the original estimate; opponents warned the amendment raised near-term fiscal pressure and deviated from stakeholder agreements cited by the sponsor.

The House later adopted a separate technical-adjustment amendment that changed the top marginal figure to 6.98 to better balance the budget estimate. Representative Dave Clark moved the 6.98 change; Representative Dunnigan and sponsor Harper supported it and the House approved the change.

Lawmakers repeatedly contrasted one-time and ongoing funding needs for education. Representative Yer moved an amendment to delay the tax cut one year and return $70 million as one-time funds to the Education Appropriations Committee; proponents described needs such as class-size reduction, textbooks and technology, while opponents cautioned one-time money should not be substituted for ongoing funding. That amendment failed on a recorded vote (32 yes, 40 no).

Multiple speakers cited fiscal notes and revenue forecasts during debate. Harper and others referenced a fiscal analyst's estimates, including figures of approximately $58.3 million for the current fiscal year under certain calculations and up to $86 million under other assumptions; members also referenced recent revenue surpluses and the monthly TC-23 revenue reports as context for short-term capacity.

After debate and several procedural votes, the House adopted the amended SB 4,001 and referred it back to the Senate. The Speaker then paused business briefly to await final papers and amendments.

Votes and formal actions recorded on the floor include adoption of Amendment 2 (sponsored by Representative Dunnigan), adoption of the 6.98 rate adjustment (moved by Representative Clark), the failed motion to delay and redirect $70 million to education (Amendment 6, moved by Representative Yer), and the final passage of SB 4,001, as amended, 49 yes, 25 no, 1 absent.

What happens next: the bill will be returned to the Senate for further consideration or concurrence on the House amendments.