Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Adult Vision Pilot topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Utah House rejects $300,000 amendment to fund one‑year adult vision pilot
Summary
Representative Thomas W. Clark proposed moving $300,000 in one‑time General Fund money to a one‑year adult vision pilot that would contract with private optometrists for exams and glasses; supporters called it an experiment in public–private partnerships but the amendment failed on the House floor.
Representative Thomas W. Clark moved Amendment No. 27 to shift $300,000 of one‑time General Fund dollars into a one‑year adult vision pilot, arguing the funding would create a public–private partnership with optometrists to provide comprehensive eye exams, frames, lenses and coatings to Medicaid recipients. Clark said private providers had already built a statewide network and that a pilot would let the state test a capitated or managed‑care approach to vision services.
Representative Ron Bigelow, the bill sponsor, acknowledged the amendment and the prior debate but did not oppose allowing floor discussion. Representative Mascaro spoke in support, saying the funding mechanism had been worked on in prior years and that the state’s most needy would benefit. Representative Morgan asked procedural questions about earlier amendments to the same budget and then returned the floor to Clark for final remarks.
After debate, the motion to amend (Amendment 27 under Representative Clark’s name) was called. Members voted orally; the presiding officer announced that the motion failed and the amendment did not pass. The bill proceeded on to additional floor action.
The House record shows advocates framed the proposal as a modest, time‑limited experiment to test private‑sector solutions for Medicaid vision needs; opponents or those who reserved concerns did not present a formal substitute motion that carried. The next procedural step was return to broader floor consideration of the underlying bill.
