Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Floor Roundup topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
House passes broad slate of bills; trust-tax, consumer-credit and waste approvals among measures sent to Senate or signed
Summary
On Feb. 15, 2006, the Utah House approved a series of bills including SB 38 (trust taxation), SB 123 (consumer credit code changes) and SB 70 (waste disposal approval reforms). Several measures passed after brief debate or technical amendments; some contested items were ‘circled’ for later work.
SALT LAKE CITY — The Utah House of Representatives moved swiftly Feb. 15, passing a package of senate and house measures ranging from tax treatment of trusts to changes in consumer credit law and the process for approving waste-disposal facilities.
SB 38, which clarifies state tax treatment for certain out-of-state grantor trusts brought to Utah, passed on a voice and recorded vote of 73 yes and 0 no after sponsor Representative Harper explained the bill would allow favorable treatment of undistributed net income for grantor trusts and help attract trusts to domicile in Utah.
The House also approved SB 123 (Utah Consumer Credit Code amendments) by a recorded vote of 72 yes, 0 no; Representative Adams said the bill shortens a state notice period from 30 days to 15 to align with federal practice for nationwide creditors. SB 137 (business organization and commercial code amendments) passed 70–0 after sponsors described changes to signature rules and claim periods for dissolved corporations.
Other measures passed with either brief floor debate or technical amendments. SB 153 (Uniform Environmental Covenants Act) was amended on the floor and passed; the transcript records 69 yes votes but does not specify the number of no votes. SB 146 (physician assistants/public health amendments) passed 69–0. SB 22 (department of community and culture amendments) passed 52–8. SB 70 (process for approval of waste disposal amendments) passed 47 yes and 27 no after prolonged debate.
Several bills were placed on the concurrence calendar or referred to the rules committee. Where the transcript lacked a specific vote count or listed partial results, the article notes that the exact figure was not specified in the House transcript.
The House scheduled a number of items for later concurrence and adjourned for the day with social and caucus events announced for the evening and following days.
Why this matters: The votes advance changes to tax, consumer-protection and environmental processes that affect businesses, landowners and state regulatory authority. Some bills will return to the Senate for signature or concurrence; those steps and any gubernatorial action will determine final implementation.
