Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Open Public Meetings topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
House adopts revisions to open-and-public-meetings law to require recordings as a backup
Summary
The Utah House adopted a conference committee report on third substitute House Bill 16 to add a recorded-audio backup to official meeting minutes; supporters said it improves transparency, while opponents warned of burdens on small/rural boards. Vote: 53–17, 5 absent.
The Utah House on the concurrence calendar adopted the conference committee report for third substitute House Bill 16, a change to the state’s open-and-public-meetings law that creates a recorded audio backup of meetings.
Representative G. Donaldson moved to adopt the conference committee report and told the chamber the substitute resolves questions raised earlier on the floor by a change at line 110. “I think this is good public policy,” Donaldson said, adding that the recording is a backup to the official written minutes and would help residents “go back and check it on tape recorder.”
Representative Dean, who had raised concerns, said the amendment that removes a few words on line 110 addresses his worries and that under the revision “anyone now can bring up a concern in a public meeting and have it addressed as long as no action is taken.”
Representative Noel questioned the impact on smaller counties and local boards, urging caution. He argued that the motions entered in the written minutes are the critical public record and called the recording requirement a potential burden: “I don't think we should step down to these small rural communities and little small boards and require that every single board has a recorded set of every single meeting.”
Supporters pushed back. Representative Harper cited a legislative audit that recommended statewide recordkeeping and said recordings are a minimal cost to ensure transparency. “Our legislative auditor recommended that all entities in the state of Utah properly keep records,” Harper said, adding that audits found meeting minutes were not always reported properly. Representative Becker said recordings provide a useful backup if written minutes are later challenged.
The presiding officer put the question and the clerk announced the result: 53 yes, 17 no, 5 absent. The motion was ruled to have passed and the bill will be returned to the Senate for the president’s signature.
The House discussion focused on the trade-off between transparency and administrative burden for small jurisdictions. Proponents stressed routine availability of a backup record to resolve disputes; opponents said the change could impose disproportionate costs and procedural risks for rural boards. The measure’s next procedural step is transmittal back to the Senate for signature by the chamber president.
