Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Budget Legislative Process topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
House approves contingency budget bill aimed at preventing shutdowns if a veto occurs
Summary
House Bill 352, a contingency measure to keep government running if a passed budget is vetoed, passed the Utah House 44–29 on Feb. 14, 2006. Supporters called it a benign safeguard; opponents warned it could shift power between the legislature and the governor and create interchamber tension.
The Utah House passed House Bill 352 on Feb. 14, 2006, a bill intended as a contingency mechanism that would allow government to continue operating in the event the legislature’s budget is vetoed.
Representative Margaret Dayton, sponsor of the bill, described it as a safeguard rather than a power grab, noting the legislature already has joint rules encouraging early budget agreement. Supporters said the bill prevents last-minute, clock-driven decisions and provides continuity of state services if negotiations break down at the end of session.
Opponents argued the bill risks altering power balances between the two legislative houses and the governor, and could lock in a prior base budget that may not reflect new federal funding changes or recently altered priorities. Members raised examples where relying on an earlier 'base' budget would leave shortfalls if federal cuts were later imposed.
After extended floor discussion, motions for previous question curtailed debate and the bill passed on a recorded vote of 44 yes and 29 no; it will be referred to the Senate.
Supporters said they hope never to use the bill but view it as a prudent procedural safety net; critics urged careful consideration of interbranch dynamics before enacting a fallback budget rule.
