Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Health Insurance Hip topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
House approves changes to Utah's high-risk insurance pool; two HIP bills pass
Summary
The Utah House passed two measures adjusting the Comprehensive Health Insurance Pool (HIP Utah): HB204 (language and procedural fixes) passed 72-0 and HB217 (waives residency for certain incoming HIP-eligible individuals) passed 67-4; sponsors said changes preserve access while aligning with federal law.
The Utah House on the floor approved two measures aimed at clarifying and accelerating access to the state's high-risk health insurance pool. House Bill 204, described by sponsor Representative Peggy Wallace as technical changes to align state code with federal requirements, passed 72-0 and will be transmitted to the Senate. House Bill 217, which waives the usual 12-month residency requirement for certain people who move to Utah after losing coverage or who had HIPAA-eligible high-risk pool coverage in another state, passed 67-4 and also goes to the Senate.
Proponents said the bills keep fragile coverage options available without expanding eligibility. Representative Wallace said HB204 removes the phrase "low cost" from the statute and changes two provisions from "shall" to "may" to ensure parity with federal law. "This is not a low cost insurance for these people," Wallace said, describing the purpose as providing access to coverage for residents denied adequate insurance and considered uninsurable.
The sponsor of HB217 told the House the measure "waives the residency requirement" for individuals who were involuntarily terminated or who had been in a high-risk pool in another state, and emphasized that the bill "does not expand eligibility to a new category of individuals; it just accelerates the process for them." During debate, Representative Hutchings sought clarification about a 63-day application window in the bill; the sponsor replied that the 63 days matches existing group provisions and that missing the window would leave the individual subject to the standard waiting period.
Fiscal details discussed on HB217 included a fiscal note the sponsor described as a conservative estimate of $100,000, and a sponsor statement that 26 individuals last year were denied for non-residency and therefore would have been affected by the change. Supporters said the changes are narrowly tailored to prevent coverage gaps for people who move to Utah and already meet federal HIPAA eligibility criteria.
Both bills were presented from the House third-reading calendar after committee recommendation and voice- or recorded-vote action on the floor. HB204 was recorded as passing 72-0; HB217 passed 67-4. Each bill will be sent to the Senate for further consideration.
The House returned to other business after the votes; committee assignments and additional second-reading referrals were handled earlier in the session.
