Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Family Policy Child Support topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Utah House passes updated child-support guidelines after heated debate, restores judicial discretion on exemptions
Summary
The House approved Second Substitute Senate Bill 23 to update Utah—hild-support tables and extend income brackets to $100,000, but adopted a substitute amendment keeping tax-exemption awards to judicial discretion; final vote was 39-34.
The Utah House of Representatives passed Second Substitute Senate Bill 23 on Feb. 27, 2007, updating the state's child-support guidelines and extending the joint-income table ceiling from $10,000 to $100,000 a month, but the chamber adopted a substitute amendment that left decisions about dependent tax exemptions to judges or administrative agencies.
Representative Fout, who brought the bill to the floor, said the measure reflects recommendations of an 11-member study committee that reviewed economic data and prepared guidelines over several years. "These individuals studied these issues for 3 years, met monthly, and made recommendations," Fout said, adding the committee included parents, judicial and ORS representatives and economists.
Representative Snow offered Amendment 3 to allow a noncustodial parent who is current on child support to claim the dependent tax exemption. Snow argued without such a provision, raising payments would push some payors further behind: "The more we raise these payments ... we create a hopeless situation for them." The sponsor opposed Snow's proposal, saying the guidelines were designed for equity and that the current allocation mechanisms better reflect the data and IRS practice.
Representative Fisher won adoption of Substitute Amendment 4, which returns the tax-exemption decision to the court or administrative agency on a case-by-case basis. Fisher called the substitute "the most equitable for a noncustodial parent" and urged members to leave allocation discretion with judges rather than bake it into a statutory formula.
Floor debate covered several policy points: Representative Reesen noted Utah's tables had not been adjusted since 1994 and warned federal Title IV requirements could force larger changes if the state did not act. Representative Harrott asked about how medical and child-care expenses are allocated; the sponsor clarified Utah currently divides those costs equally, unlike most states that allocate proportionally. Opponents, including Representative Snow and others, cautioned that raising guideline amounts without preserving judicial flexibility could harm parents with atypical circumstances.
After debate, the House invoked the previous question to end debate and voted 39 to 34 to pass the second substitute as amended. The bill will now go to the Senate for further consideration.
The action leaves intact the committee—ffort to modernize support tables while explicitly preserving judicial discretion over dependent exemptions. Next procedural steps: the measure is transmitted to the Senate for consideration.
