Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Tourism Economic Development topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
House approves shift of tourism account funds toward sporting events; SB198 passes 58–13
Summary
The House voted to increase the tourism performance marketing account share directed toward sporting events from 7.5% to 10% and passed Senate Bill 198, after sponsor Representative Urquhart said the change would provide an ongoing funding stream to support events and a separate $4 million one-time budget item was proposed to recruit USA Cycling.
Get email alerts on the Tourism Economic Development topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The Utah House on Feb. 26 voted to uncircle and pass Senate Bill 198, a tourism amendment that increases the portion of the tourism performance marketing account dedicated to sporting events from 7.5 percent to 10 percent. Sponsor Representative Urquhart said the change creates an ongoing revenue stream to support sporting events such as cycling tours, marathons and triathlons and complements a proposed one-time $4 million budget proposal to recruit USA Cycling to the state.
Opponents questioned the fiscal prudence of increasing the ongoing percentage while also proposing a separate one-time appropriation. Representative Allen argued the increase amounted to an unnecessarily large appropriation for the first year given the commission's current budget and reliance on state funds. Representative Fisher moved an amendment to retain the 7.5 percent share but withdrew the amendment and ultimately spoke in opposition, citing lack of committee-level detail on how the $4 million would be spent and requesting greater transparency on outcomes.
Representative Urquhart responded that the shift is a reallocation of existing tourism marketing funds rather than new money, estimating the change would amount to roughly $250,000 based on an account balance of about $10 million. The House voted 58 in favor and 13 opposed to pass SB198; the bill was signed by the Speaker and will be transmitted to the Senate for the President's signature.
The debate focused on balancing one-time recruitment dollars with an ongoing revenue stream for events that sponsors argued generate out‑of‑state visitors and television exposure. Opponents raised concerns about committing a larger ongoing share without clearer documentation of program outcomes.
