Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Health Insurance topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

House approves change to Health Insurance Pool lifetime limits after extended debate

Utah House of Representatives · January 19, 2007
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Lawmakers passed HB 80 to raise lifetime maximums and clarify HIP eligibility rules; sponsors said the change prevents loss of coverage for high‑cost individuals and reduces uncompensated emergency care costs, while skeptics warned of long‑term fiscal impact. Vote: 60‑4, 11 absent.

The Utah House on Friday passed HB 80, a bill adjusting provisions for the state's Health Insurance Pool (HIP), after extended floor debate about long‑term costs and program structure.

Representative James Dunnigan, sponsor, described HIP as a state‑subsidized high‑risk pool intended for individuals who cannot obtain private coverage, noting that insured participants pay roughly 73 percent of premiums. He said the bill would raise lifetime benefit maximums (discussed on the floor as moving committee language from $1,000,000 to $1.5 million and debated in discussion as higher in other drafts) and ensure that people who have employer contributions are not eligible for HIP. "HIP is not designed to take the sick risks from an employer group," Dunnigan said, adding that the change aims to protect the pool and prevent people from ending up with no coverage.

Members pressed the sponsor on fiscal notes and membership counts. Representative Tilton asked, "How many people do we have currently in the pool?" Dunnigan replied the pool enrollment was "about 3,200 people," and explained the bill's provisions apply across high‑cost conditions such as hemophilia, cancer and AIDS. Representative Kaiser noted HIP has an annual maximum of $300,000 and that changes to lifetime maximums do not allow a sudden single‑year spike above the annual cap.

Opponents raised concerns about future costs. Sponsors acknowledged fiscal uncertainties but said the bill reduces uncompensated emergency care by keeping people insured rather than uninsured once they hit lifetime limits. After discussion, the House passed HB 80 on a vote of 60 yes, 4 no; 11 members were absent. The bill is now referred to the Senate for further action.